Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 223 MONTAUK GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 795

LEVEL 1

201

25%

LEVEL 2

297

37%

LEVEL 3

203

26%

LEVEL 4

94

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

406
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 870

LEVEL 1

187

21%

LEVEL 2

277

32%

LEVEL 3

224

26%

LEVEL 4

182

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

79

21%

LEVEL 2

140

36%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

219
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

75

18%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

104

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

122

30%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

112

25%

LEVEL 2

143

32%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

230
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

312
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

73

14%

LEVEL 2

154

29%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

154

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

30

40%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

95

44%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

84

40%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

160

22%

LEVEL 2

282

38%

LEVEL 3

200

27%

LEVEL 4

94

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 816

LEVEL 1

151

19%

LEVEL 2

262

32%

LEVEL 3

221

27%

LEVEL 4

182

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

41

69%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

36

67%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

194
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

186

40%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

294
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

160

29%

LEVEL 4

134

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

112

34%

LEVEL 2

111

34%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

109

33%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 760

LEVEL 1

194

26%

LEVEL 2

284

37%

LEVEL 3

190

25%

LEVEL 4

92

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

389
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 824

LEVEL 1

177

21%

LEVEL 2

258

31%

LEVEL 3

214

26%

LEVEL 4

175

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.