Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 62 DITMAS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,120

LEVEL 1

444

40%

LEVEL 2

415

37%

LEVEL 3

173

15%

LEVEL 4

88

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,068

LEVEL 1

366

34%

LEVEL 2

418

39%

LEVEL 3

193

18%

LEVEL 4

91

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

226

41%

LEVEL 2

202

37%

LEVEL 3

81

15%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

198

35%

LEVEL 2

219

39%

LEVEL 3

103

18%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

218

38%

LEVEL 2

213

38%

LEVEL 3

92

16%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

168

33%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

124
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

99

28%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

122

45%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

92

37%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

141

43%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

115

36%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

52

16%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,100

LEVEL 1

429

39%

LEVEL 2

411

37%

LEVEL 3

172

16%

LEVEL 4

88

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,050

LEVEL 1

354

34%

LEVEL 2

412

39%

LEVEL 3

193

18%

LEVEL 4

91

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

15

75%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 810

LEVEL 1

239

30%

LEVEL 2

332

41%

LEVEL 3

157

19%

LEVEL 4

82

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

263
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 818

LEVEL 1

216

26%

LEVEL 2

339

41%

LEVEL 3

175

21%

LEVEL 4

88

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

205

66%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

16

5%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

150

60%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,021

LEVEL 1

410

40%

LEVEL 2

381

37%

LEVEL 3

149

15%

LEVEL 4

81

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 899

LEVEL 1

303

34%

LEVEL 2

353

39%

LEVEL 3

162

18%

LEVEL 4

81

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.