Skip to Content
Main content

PS 105 BLYTHEBOURNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

634
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 903

LEVEL 1

59

7%

LEVEL 2

210

23%

LEVEL 3

303

34%

LEVEL 4

331

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

634
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 883

LEVEL 1

62

7%

LEVEL 2

187

21%

LEVEL 3

260

29%

LEVEL 4

374

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

303
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

150

34%

LEVEL 4

153

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

307
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

175

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

331
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

108

23%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

178

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

327
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

86

19%

LEVEL 3

128

29%

LEVEL 4

199

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

623
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 852

LEVEL 1

42

5%

LEVEL 2

187

22%

LEVEL 3

296

35%

LEVEL 4

327

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

616
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 815

LEVEL 1

42

5%

LEVEL 2

157

19%

LEVEL 3

245

30%

LEVEL 4

371

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

19

59%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

20

50%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

619
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

38

5%

LEVEL 2

179

21%

LEVEL 3

289

35%

LEVEL 4

330

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

614
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 811

LEVEL 1

41

5%

LEVEL 2

156

19%

LEVEL 3

247

30%

LEVEL 4

367

45%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

31

46%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

31

43%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

417
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

95

18%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

245

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

446
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

97

17%

LEVEL 3

162

29%

LEVEL 4

284

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

217
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

86

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

188
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

90

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

109

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

467
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

41

6%

LEVEL 2

139

21%

LEVEL 3

202

31%

LEVEL 4

265

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.