Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 302 RAFAEL CORDERO GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

369

68%

LEVEL 2

126

23%

LEVEL 3

36

7%

LEVEL 4

8

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

152

61%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

167

68%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

69

60%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

202

68%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

83

62%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

122

72%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

52

73%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

228

68%

LEVEL 2

79

24%

LEVEL 3

24

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

90

56%

LEVEL 2

58

36%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

274

64%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

33

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

95

87%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

43

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

43
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

275

63%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

35

8%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

115

56%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

94

92%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

37

88%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

72

77%

LEVEL 2

17

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

43

62%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

297

67%

LEVEL 2

109

24%

LEVEL 3

33

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

109

61%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.