Skip to Content
Main content

PS 276 LOUIS MARSHALL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

174

52%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

153

48%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

73

46%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

68

44%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

101

56%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

85

52%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

159

51%

LEVEL 2

80

26%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

129

47%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

116

44%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

45

75%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

37

64%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

142

47%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

131

45%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

32

91%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

28

45%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

33

47%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

146

53%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

120

48%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.