Skip to Content
Main content

PS 114 RYDER ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

160

54%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

119

45%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

75

49%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

49

38%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

85

59%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

70

50%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

138

54%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

96

44%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

16

64%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

112

47%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

72

35%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

48

86%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

47

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

129

49%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

31

89%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

38

43%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

81

46%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.