Skip to Content
Main content

PS 289 GEORGE V BROWER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

63

33%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

50

42%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

51

33%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

52

29%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

67

46%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

31

70%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.