Skip to Content
Main content

PS 58 CARROLL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

68

16%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

183

44%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

72

19%

LEVEL 3

144

37%

LEVEL 4

153

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

80

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

75

38%

LEVEL 4

75

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

171
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

32

15%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

103

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

78

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

17

74%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

20

65%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

13

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

137

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

45

17%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

106

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

44

13%

LEVEL 3

125

37%

LEVEL 4

165

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

60

18%

LEVEL 3

122

36%

LEVEL 4

147

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

16

21%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

22

42%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

307
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

61

15%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

177

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

286
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

138

37%

LEVEL 4

148

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

299
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

45

13%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

174

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

281
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

57

16%

LEVEL 3

136

39%

LEVEL 4

145

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

23

36%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.