Skip to Content
Main content

MS 390 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

185

48%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

222

61%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

91

46%

LEVEL 2

80

41%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

105

59%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

94

50%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

117

62%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

36

59%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

145

48%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

183

61%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

166

56%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

45

62%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

56

80%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

97

35%

LEVEL 2

125

45%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

137

51%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

88

81%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

85

87%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

143

38%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

200

62%

LEVEL 2

95

29%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.