Skip to Content
Main content

PS 91 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

112

36%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

54

43%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

51

36%

LEVEL 2

54

38%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

26

40%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

78

37%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

40

68%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

58

67%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

68

35%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

37

47%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

45

49%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.