Skip to Content
Main content

RIVERDALE/KINGSBRIDGE (MS/HS 141) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

158

26%

LEVEL 2

237

40%

LEVEL 3

135

23%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

125

21%

LEVEL 2

208

35%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

101

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

75

25%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

85

28%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

71

42%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

134

42%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

80

17%

LEVEL 2

191

41%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

182

38%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

78

58%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

67

61%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

129

23%

LEVEL 2

225

41%

LEVEL 3

133

24%

LEVEL 4

67

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

250
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

98

18%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

150

28%

LEVEL 4

100

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

29

64%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

110

33%

LEVEL 2

144

43%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

128

40%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.