Skip to Content
Main content

PS 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

172

46%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

178

45%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

85

45%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

98

49%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

93

45%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

29

47%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

140

46%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

150

47%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

118

40%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

120

39%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

54

68%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

58

64%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

94

36%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

108

38%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

78

70%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

70

60%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

158

45%

LEVEL 2

124

36%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.