Skip to Content
Main content

PS 163 ARTHUR A SCHOMBERG GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

137

47%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

41

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

113

40%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

58

40%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

79

53%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

60

42%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

36

39%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

102

50%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

77

41%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

93

41%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

44

67%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

43

60%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

68

36%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

55

28%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

69

64%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

58

67%

LEVEL 2

20

23%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.