Skip to Content
Main content

JHS 123 JAMES M KIERNAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

318

69%

LEVEL 2

125

27%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

276

71%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

16

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

162

69%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

8

3%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

140

73%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

156

70%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

136

69%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

69

69%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

54

71%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

242

70%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

8

2%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

215

72%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

13

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

230

64%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

186

64%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

88

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

90

90%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

231

64%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

12

3%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

198

66%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

87

91%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

78

86%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

43

57%

LEVEL 2

26

35%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

233

74%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

11

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.