PS 161 JUAN PONCE DE LEON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

114

47%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

49

46%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

29

28%

LEVEL 2

51

50%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

65

48%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

32

51%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

26

47%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

86

51%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

73

41%

LEVEL 2

73

41%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

70

44%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

41

65%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

69

41%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

39

63%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

108

46%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

68

32%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.