Skip to Content
Main content

PS 192 JACOB H SCHIFF GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

66

43%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

57

46%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

34

46%

LEVEL 2

33

45%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

58

42%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

57

44%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

29

27%

LEVEL 2

51

48%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

31

66%

LEVEL 2

15

32%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

23

72%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

20

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

56

48%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.