Skip to Content
Main content

PS 153 ADAM CLAYTON POWELL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

226

55%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

147

41%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

50

25%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

62

34%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

129

61%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

85

48%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

51

67%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

33

48%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

172

54%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

173

49%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

101

34%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

53

90%

LEVEL 2

4

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

46

75%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

89
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

75

30%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

108

80%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

72

66%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

20

45%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

206

56%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

133

43%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.