Skip to Content
Main content

PS 152 DYCKMAN VALLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

131

40%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

56

36%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

51

38%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

118

37%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

103

39%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

116

44%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

78

35%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

45

73%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

95

45%

LEVEL 3

44

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

68

59%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

56

63%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

116

38%

LEVEL 2

122

40%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

101

39%

LEVEL 2

95

37%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.