PS 42 BENJAMIN ALTMAN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

195

54%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

56

15%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

181

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

29

17%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

88

51%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

75

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

21

11%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

107

57%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

106

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

287
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

191

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

285
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

50

14%

LEVEL 3

115

32%

LEVEL 4

170

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

34

11%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

190

60%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

285
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

37

11%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

175

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

9

21%

LEVEL 2

16

37%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

241
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

172

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

267
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

169

54%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

54
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

31

38%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

18

15%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

71

58%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

110

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.