Skip to Content
Main content

UNQUA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

105

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

41

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

53

29%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

52

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

21

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

53

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

220
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

116

34%

LEVEL 4

104

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

39

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

104

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

41

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

87

28%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

95

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.