Skip to Content
Main content

BERNER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 686

LEVEL 1

60

9%

LEVEL 2

306

45%

LEVEL 3

262

38%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

126

42%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

129

41%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

48

36%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

180

49%

LEVEL 3

133

36%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

303
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 645

LEVEL 1

53

8%

LEVEL 2

289

45%

LEVEL 3

251

39%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 626

LEVEL 1

32

5%

LEVEL 2

282

45%

LEVEL 3

254

41%

LEVEL 4

58

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

120

44%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

298
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

51

8%

LEVEL 2

269

44%

LEVEL 3

243

39%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

37

54%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

18

69%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.