Skip to Content
Main content

KRAMER LANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

57

40%

LEVEL 4

55

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

36

36%

LEVEL 4

35

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

29

37%

LEVEL 4

30

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

17

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

28

43%

LEVEL 4

25

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

18

42%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

9

75%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

44

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

26

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

54

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

36

38%

LEVEL 4

34

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

52

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

30

36%

LEVEL 4

32

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.