Skip to Content
Main content

JERICHO UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

816
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,008

LEVEL 1

50

5%

LEVEL 2

142

14%

LEVEL 3

359

36%

LEVEL 4

457

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

792
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 942

LEVEL 1

29

3%

LEVEL 2

121

13%

LEVEL 3

313

33%

LEVEL 4

479

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

377
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

66

14%

LEVEL 3

171

37%

LEVEL 4

206

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

366
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

61

14%

LEVEL 3

160

37%

LEVEL 4

206

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

439
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

27

5%

LEVEL 2

76

14%

LEVEL 3

188

35%

LEVEL 4

251

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

426
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

21

4%

LEVEL 2

60

12%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

273

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

430
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

38

8%

LEVEL 3

140

29%

LEVEL 4

290

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

496
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

10

2%

LEVEL 2

41

7%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

337

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

362
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

206

43%

LEVEL 4

156

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

65

19%

LEVEL 3

139

40%

LEVEL 4

132

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

777
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 911

LEVEL 1

22

2%

LEVEL 2

112

12%

LEVEL 3

329

36%

LEVEL 4

448

49%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

759
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

94

11%

LEVEL 3

294

34%

LEVEL 4

465

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

28

29%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

796
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 979

LEVEL 1

48

5%

LEVEL 2

135

14%

LEVEL 3

349

36%

LEVEL 4

447

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

758
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 903

LEVEL 1

27

3%

LEVEL 2

118

13%

LEVEL 3

296

33%

LEVEL 4

462

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

17

44%

LEVEL 4

17

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

797
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 975

LEVEL 1

44

5%

LEVEL 2

134

14%

LEVEL 3

347

36%

LEVEL 4

450

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

772
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 912

LEVEL 1

25

3%

LEVEL 2

115

13%

LEVEL 3

305

33%

LEVEL 4

467

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

12

36%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

12

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.