GEORGE A JACKSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

25

11%

LEVEL 3

87

37%

LEVEL 4

118

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

120

56%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

50

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

50

55%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

49

38%

LEVEL 4

68

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

70

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

122
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

4%

LEVEL 3

46

36%

LEVEL 4

76

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

129
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

89

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

40

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

27

41%

LEVEL 4

28

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

19

9%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

117

54%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

62

33%

LEVEL 4

117

62%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

202
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

22

10%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

115

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

182
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

116

56%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

114

51%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

115

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.