BAYVILLE PRIMARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

25

14%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

94

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

51

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

48

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

27

47%

LEVEL 4

22

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

46

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

29

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

80

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

45

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

87

55%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

14%

LEVEL 3

46

43%

LEVEL 4

45

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

93

52%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

94
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

44

38%

LEVEL 4

50

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

89

57%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

44

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

15

58%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.