Skip to Content
Main content

SEARINGTOWN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

122

46%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

97

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

65

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

45

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

57

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

52

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

128
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

83

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

81

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

37

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

22

41%

LEVEL 4

14

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

121

52%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

94

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

9

25%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

194
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

120

48%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

94

47%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

117

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

92

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.