Skip to Content
Main content

HERRICKS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

450
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

158

24%

LEVEL 3

241

37%

LEVEL 4

209

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

347
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

171

34%

LEVEL 4

176

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

209
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

120

40%

LEVEL 4

89

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

75

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

241
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

82

23%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

120

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

101

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

282
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

69

18%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

154

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

247
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

70

21%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

130

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

99

41%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

38

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

12

31%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

432
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

16

3%

LEVEL 2

119

21%

LEVEL 3

228

40%

LEVEL 4

204

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

95

22%

LEVEL 3

161

37%

LEVEL 4

172

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

36

39%

LEVEL 2

39

42%

LEVEL 3

13

14%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

28

43%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

447
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

43

7%

LEVEL 2

149

23%

LEVEL 3

238

37%

LEVEL 4

209

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

344
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

117

24%

LEVEL 3

170

35%

LEVEL 4

174

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

426
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

145

23%

LEVEL 3

224

36%

LEVEL 4

202

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

316
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

108

24%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

163

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

17

40%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

18

33%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.