NORTH SIDE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

105

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

55

29%

LEVEL 4

105

55%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

44

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

66

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

12%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

61

60%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

46
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

35

66%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

44
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

37

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

68

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

60

48%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

102

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

103

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

101

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

156
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

55

30%

LEVEL 4

101

55%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

103

48%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

100

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.