ROSLYN UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

719
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,111

LEVEL 1

96

9%

LEVEL 2

296

27%

LEVEL 3

379

34%

LEVEL 4

340

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

623
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 836

LEVEL 1

47

6%

LEVEL 2

166

20%

LEVEL 3

265

32%

LEVEL 4

358

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

341
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

158

29%

LEVEL 3

183

34%

LEVEL 4

158

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

286
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

145

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

378
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

52

9%

LEVEL 2

138

24%

LEVEL 3

196

35%

LEVEL 4

182

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

337
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

213

49%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

76

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

143
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

92

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

547
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 821

LEVEL 1

50

6%

LEVEL 2

224

27%

LEVEL 3

299

36%

LEVEL 4

248

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

448
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

18

3%

LEVEL 2

115

20%

LEVEL 3

198

34%

LEVEL 4

250

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

22

41%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

700
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,004

LEVEL 1

50

5%

LEVEL 2

254

25%

LEVEL 3

363

36%

LEVEL 4

337

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

610
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

27

3%

LEVEL 2

141

18%

LEVEL 3

256

33%

LEVEL 4

354

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

42

39%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

25

43%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

710
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,077

LEVEL 1

83

8%

LEVEL 2

284

26%

LEVEL 3

371

34%

LEVEL 4

339

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

613
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 806

LEVEL 1

36

4%

LEVEL 2

157

19%

LEVEL 3

258

32%

LEVEL 4

355

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

13

38%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

677
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 996

LEVEL 1

62

6%

LEVEL 2

257

26%

LEVEL 3

348

35%

LEVEL 4

329

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

585
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 745

LEVEL 1

25

3%

LEVEL 2

135

18%

LEVEL 3

243

33%

LEVEL 4

342

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

22

24%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

22

24%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.