Skip to Content
Main content

GRAND AVENUE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

77

16%

LEVEL 2

192

39%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

35

33%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

44

45%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

19

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

184
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

159

39%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

167

40%

LEVEL 3

145

35%

LEVEL 4

68

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

77

43%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

37

54%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

166

38%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

26

48%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.