Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM L BUCK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

42

20%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

54

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

29

23%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

42

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

28

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

21

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

28

29%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

26

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

21

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

4

12%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

25

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

15

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

54

30%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

42

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

28

93%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

54

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

39

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.