Skip to Content
Main content

ROCKVILLE CENTRE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

396
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

103

13%

LEVEL 2

271

35%

LEVEL 3

255

33%

LEVEL 4

141

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

174

30%

LEVEL 3

223

38%

LEVEL 4

121

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

196
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

105

38%

LEVEL 4

61

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

200
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

66

16%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

118

39%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

331
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 613

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

216

35%

LEVEL 4

115

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

275
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

136

31%

LEVEL 3

181

41%

LEVEL 4

94

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

208

40%

LEVEL 4

116

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

23

39%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

344
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

172

30%

LEVEL 3

223

39%

LEVEL 4

121

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

328
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

213

41%

LEVEL 4

115

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.