Skip to Content
Main content

JONAS E SALK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

205

38%

LEVEL 3

162

30%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

79

33%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

37

41%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

12

39%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

167

40%

LEVEL 3

126

30%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

9

25%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

181

39%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

71

39%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

42

58%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

87

16%

LEVEL 2

202

38%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

107
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

220
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

29

40%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.