BARNUM WOODS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

141

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

89

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

119
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

62

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

44

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

79

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

25

20%

LEVEL 3

51

40%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

39

59%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

48
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

29

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

81

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

39

36%

LEVEL 4

44

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

8

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

9

17%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

139

39%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

86

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

265
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

140

37%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

80

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

22

32%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

9

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.