Skip to Content
Main content

LAWRENCE ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

261

38%

LEVEL 2

279

41%

LEVEL 3

110

16%

LEVEL 4

28

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

241

42%

LEVEL 2

218

38%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

106

35%

LEVEL 2

135

44%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

155

42%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

60

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

129

42%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

79
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

136

39%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

103

37%

LEVEL 2

116

42%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

121

39%

LEVEL 2

138

44%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

134

47%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

198

33%

LEVEL 2

265

44%

LEVEL 3

109

18%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

195

38%

LEVEL 2

211

41%

LEVEL 3

93

18%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

63

81%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

46

84%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

135
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

199

33%

LEVEL 2

266

44%

LEVEL 3

107

18%

LEVEL 4

28

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

175

35%

LEVEL 2

209

42%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

62

79%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

66

86%

LEVEL 2

9

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

80

47%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

208

41%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

85

17%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

191

43%

LEVEL 2

168

38%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.