Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

144

21%

LEVEL 2

264

39%

LEVEL 3

196

29%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

136

42%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

142
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

66

32%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

259
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

136

21%

LEVEL 2

252

39%

LEVEL 3

192

30%

LEVEL 4

67

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

74

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

85

15%

LEVEL 2

224

39%

LEVEL 3

192

34%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

59

56%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

89

30%

LEVEL 2

128

43%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

40

26%

LEVEL 2

60

39%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.