Skip to Content
Main content

A D OLIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

166

23%

LEVEL 2

334

47%

LEVEL 3

160

22%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

67

18%

LEVEL 2

159

44%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

166

47%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

90

47%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

168

46%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

183
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

274

47%

LEVEL 3

131

22%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

14

58%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

94

15%

LEVEL 2

325

51%

LEVEL 3

158

25%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

153

46%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

72

87%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

25

74%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

199

47%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

135

46%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

36

25%

LEVEL 2

75

53%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.