Skip to Content
Main content

WILLINK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

121

16%

LEVEL 2

325

42%

LEVEL 3

197

26%

LEVEL 4

127

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

165
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

152

42%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

46

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

173

43%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

296
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

98

14%

LEVEL 2

290

42%

LEVEL 3

179

26%

LEVEL 4

117

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

76

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

11

58%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 681

LEVEL 1

63

9%

LEVEL 2

301

44%

LEVEL 3

193

28%

LEVEL 4

124

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

84

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

58

65%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

296
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

71

11%

LEVEL 2

279

43%

LEVEL 3

178

28%

LEVEL 4

118

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

79

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

50

40%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.