Skip to Content
Main content

BEAVER RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

136

36%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

127

40%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

108

36%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

27

50%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.