Skip to Content
Main content

CASE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

233

48%

LEVEL 2

183

38%

LEVEL 3

55

11%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

168

47%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

102

46%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

88

46%

LEVEL 2

77

40%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

131

51%

LEVEL 2

90

35%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

158

45%

LEVEL 2

145

41%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

28

62%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

18

47%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

30

56%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

154

39%

LEVEL 2

170

43%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

105

37%

LEVEL 2

125

44%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

79

86%

LEVEL 2

13

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

63

82%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

72

37%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

161

56%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

132

54%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.