GREGORY B JARVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

219

40%

LEVEL 2

196

36%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

127

38%

LEVEL 2

126

38%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

75

44%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

73

45%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

204

39%

LEVEL 2

186

36%

LEVEL 3

99

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

119

38%

LEVEL 2

120

39%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

137

30%

LEVEL 2

185

40%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

82

86%

LEVEL 2

11

12%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

45

92%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

38

27%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

157

47%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

89

46%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.