Skip to Content
Main content

FRANKFORT-SCHUYLER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

138

41%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

22

28%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

29

32%

LEVEL 2

30

33%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

134

42%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

133

45%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

39

25%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

34

87%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

12

86%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

21

21%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.