Skip to Content
Main content

COXSACKIE-ATHENS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

153

30%

LEVEL 2

191

37%

LEVEL 3

127

25%

LEVEL 4

46

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

117

27%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

107

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

89

41%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

78

30%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

131

29%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

84

21%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

33

72%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

66

21%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

101

41%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.