Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

258

44%

LEVEL 2

196

33%

LEVEL 3

109

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

140

37%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

113

40%

LEVEL 2

95

33%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

145

47%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

168

41%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

87

34%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

50

63%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

27

57%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

28

40%

LEVEL 2

32

46%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

20

39%

LEVEL 2

22

43%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

176

36%

LEVEL 2

176

36%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

41

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

82

77%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

254

44%

LEVEL 2

187

32%

LEVEL 3

106

18%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

109

38%

LEVEL 2

92

32%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

39

22%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

149

49%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

101

49%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.