ARCADIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

208

30%

LEVEL 2

307

44%

LEVEL 3

125

18%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

130

33%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

155

47%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

45

25%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

113

31%

LEVEL 2

152

42%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

85

39%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

9

69%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

213

44%

LEVEL 3

108

22%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

79

30%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

26

42%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

43

49%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

20

40%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

137

24%

LEVEL 2

276

48%

LEVEL 3

119

20%

LEVEL 4

49

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

71

65%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

49

68%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

175
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

201

30%

LEVEL 2

304

45%

LEVEL 3

125

18%

LEVEL 4

50

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

124
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

124

32%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

147

40%

LEVEL 2

164

45%

LEVEL 3

41

11%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

88

40%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.