Skip to Content
Main content

BROADALBIN-PERTH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

206

28%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

165

23%

LEVEL 4

92

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

115

22%

LEVEL 2

183

36%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

87

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

99

27%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

68

25%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

196

28%

LEVEL 2

250

36%

LEVEL 3

156

23%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

110

23%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

157

24%

LEVEL 2

246

38%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

91

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

168

37%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

87

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

49

65%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

90

21%

LEVEL 2

147

34%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.