Skip to Content
Main content

GLOVERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,215

LEVEL 1

545

45%

LEVEL 2

460

38%

LEVEL 3

166

14%

LEVEL 4

44

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

320

48%

LEVEL 2

231

34%

LEVEL 3

98

15%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 578

LEVEL 1

263

46%

LEVEL 2

220

38%

LEVEL 3

80

14%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

282

44%

LEVEL 2

240

38%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

163

46%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,079

LEVEL 1

473

44%

LEVEL 2

420

39%

LEVEL 3

149

14%

LEVEL 4

37

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

273

47%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

85

15%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

40

66%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 987

LEVEL 1

357

36%

LEVEL 2

424

43%

LEVEL 3

163

17%

LEVEL 4

43

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

180

35%

LEVEL 2

216

42%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

188

82%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

3

1%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

140

89%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

130

43%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 911

LEVEL 1

448

49%

LEVEL 2

330

36%

LEVEL 3

109

12%

LEVEL 4

24

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

267

52%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

63

12%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.