Skip to Content
Main content

MALONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

375

48%

LEVEL 2

254

33%

LEVEL 3

121

16%

LEVEL 4

27

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

161

44%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

75

41%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

214

52%

LEVEL 2

140

34%

LEVEL 3

48

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

86

45%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 753

LEVEL 1

363

48%

LEVEL 2

244

32%

LEVEL 3

119

16%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

152

42%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

249

39%

LEVEL 2

235

37%

LEVEL 3

121

19%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

108

35%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

126

87%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

53

83%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

257

59%

LEVEL 2

126

29%

LEVEL 3

43

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

118

53%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

146
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 748

LEVEL 1

356

48%

LEVEL 2

246

33%

LEVEL 3

119

16%

LEVEL 4

27

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

155

42%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.