Skip to Content
Main content

SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 657

LEVEL 1

282

43%

LEVEL 2

249

38%

LEVEL 3

97

15%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

176

40%

LEVEL 2

171

39%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

171

51%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

107

44%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

196

46%

LEVEL 2

158

37%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

109

41%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

89

40%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

65

38%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

195

35%

LEVEL 2

236

43%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

113

30%

LEVEL 2

166

45%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

87

85%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

63

89%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

33

25%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

33

43%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

254

48%

LEVEL 2

193

37%

LEVEL 3

64

12%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

163

44%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

126
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 650

LEVEL 1

277

43%

LEVEL 2

247

38%

LEVEL 3

97

15%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

166

39%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

77

18%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.