Skip to Content
Main content

TICONDEROGA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

130

44%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

60

29%

LEVEL 2

87

41%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

64

47%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

44

41%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

125

44%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

122

51%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

27

77%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

57

45%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

73

44%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

47

43%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.